This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I completely agree with the quality-of-implementation concept. Unfortunately, the Standard is vague. If STAT= is present and an error condition occurs the "allocate-object will have a processor-dependent status". Then later in the same paragraph, we find "each allocate-object that was not successfully allocated shall retain its previous allocation status ...". I could be wrong, but this simply means ALLOCATED(x) will be .true. and we have either x(4) or x(3). :(
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |