This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch, fortran] Inline DOT_PRODUCT

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GNU GFortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:56:58 +0100
Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] Inline DOT_PRODUCT
References: <756DFD3DE8F1D411A59A00306E06E84702C42A05@drfccad.cad.cea.fr> <84fc9c000602270329k435357c6h1a0be37f57f5e5ce@mail.gmail.com>

It makes no difference whatsoever - should I be changing the TREEery to benefit from it?

I was just curious.

I think the patch is fine as it is.  Vectorization capabilities can be
investigated later

I agree, probably the changes should be generic and would affect user code as well because I see that you're mostly relying on the scalarizer.

Paolo

References:
- RE: [Patch, fortran] Inline DOT_PRODUCT
  - From: THOMAS Paul Richard 169137
- Re: [Patch, fortran] Inline DOT_PRODUCT
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]