This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran, committed] Fix regressions introduced by patch for PR 25045
- From: Thomas Koenig <Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de>
- To: Toon Moene <moene at knmi dot nl>
- Cc: Tobias dot Schlueter at Physik dot Uni-Muenchen dot DE, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, thomas dot koeni at online dot de
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:32:12 +0100
- Subject: Re: [gfortran, committed] Fix regressions introduced by patch for PR 25045
- References: <43F31539.2020202@knmi.nl>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:49:13AM +0000, Toon Moene wrote:
> Tobias wrote:
>
> > I committed the following under the obviously correct rule.
>
> And now the obvious question: How could this ever have been committed -
> this cannot have passed make -k check on any architecture known to man
> (errr, gcc) ?
I did run a regression-test on this, which passed (as I wrote).
There may have been issues with an incomplete build, because I
didn't start with a clean tree.
Again, sorry
Thomas