This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Fortran, patch] Fix for PR fortran/26054: Gratuitous warning about Fortran 2003 features.
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- To: fxcoudert at gmail dot com, toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, moene at knmi dot nl
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:07:18 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Fortran, patch] Fix for PR fortran/26054: Gratuitous warning about Fortran 2003 features.
FX wrote:
>> I agree with the submitter of this bug report that we should
>> not warn *by default* about the Fortran 2003 features we support.
>While I agree with you that no warning should be issued by default
>about F2003 constructs, I think checking for the warning in the
>testcases is indeed a good thing. Perhaps, instead of removing the
>dg-warning directive in all the concerned testcases like you propose,
>we could add a { dg-option "-std=f95" } directive in each of them?
I'm not really familiar with the testing harness - I'm going to try
this and report back.
Cheers, and thanks for your thoughts,
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/
My next PC will have a crank