This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux
- From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
- To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- Cc: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, jakub at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:57:52 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux
- References: <20060127165807.GV32233@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0601311640500.627@wotan.suse.de> <20060131172535.GQ32233@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <43E05F19.4000103@codesourcery.com> <20060201114321.06a000f3.bkoz@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602011901160.627@wotan.suse.de>
Michael Matz wrote:
>>SONAME 7 has been in progress for some time: there will be no "bumping"
>>of the SONAME in mainline, but instead a merge of libstdcxx_so_7-branch.
>>
>>Remember, hombre? This was the plan that the SC, release manager, and
>>libstdc++ developers came up with at the last SONAME change. Seems like
>>an improvement to the old process to me.
>>
>>
>Yeah, a SONAME bump right now would be so horrible, I don't even want to
>start thinking about this, definitely not just for this ldbl-128 feature
>;)
>
>
Indeed...
Paolo.
- References:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Optionally use -mlong-double-128 by default on {powerpc{,64},s390{,x},sparc,alpha}-linux