Re: ICE on invalid c++

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>]

On Dec 23, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Mike Stump wrote:

> template <class T> class C {
>     typedef T* int;
> };
>
> ICEs due to the fact the DECL_NAME is 0.  With the below patch, we now 
> get:
>
> t1.cc:2: error: expected unqualified-id before 'int'
> t1.cc:2: error: expected ';' before 'int'
>
> and no ICE.  Now, the only question is, do we want to put the check 
> here, or, should we catch this sooner?
>
> This is a regression from 3.3.
>
> Ok?

If this does not get reviewed in a week, please file a bug so we don't 
lose
track of this bug (regression).

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski