This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR middle-end/25121: [4.1/4.2 Regression] libgcj misscompilation? [Was Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P]
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:42:12 -0800
- Subject: Re: PR middle-end/25121: [4.1/4.2 Regression] libgcj misscompilation? [Was Re: RFC: peephole vs RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P]
- References: <17318.64145.41810.488474@zapata.pink> <m38xuglvrk.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <17319.3754.844531.876599@zapata.pink> <m34q54lot9.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <20051220073124.GA3576@redhat.com> <17319.60836.34444.488954@zapata.pink> <20051220171816.GA5085@redhat.com> <17320.16231.380970.473339@zapata.pink>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 05:29:11PM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Oh, joy. Now I have to figure out what peep2_current_count is doing...
Counting the number of sequential valid instructions in the buffer.
Reset it to zero when you find a frame insn.
r~