This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Reject invalid specifiers for virtual functions

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer dot com>
Cc: Volker Reichelt <reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 14:56:26 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch] Reject invalid specifiers for virtual functions
References: <tkrat.7a9e2993c84b097b@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> <439DBA06.5030909@codesourcery.com> <082801c5ff5a$438227b0$bf03030a@trilan>

Giovanni Bajo wrote:

> Like in this patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-02/msg02318.html

Right.

> In the review, Neil suggested that cpplib.h is not a good place to put the
> flag, though.

I disagree with Neil on this point, especially given that we have
NAMED_OP, which is C++-specific.  Per is our current cpplib maintainer;
perhaps he has input?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] Reject invalid specifiers for virtual functions
  - From: Volker Reichelt

References:
- [patch] Reject invalid specifiers for virtual functions
  - From: Volker Reichelt
- Re: [patch] Reject invalid specifiers for virtual functions
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [patch] Reject invalid specifiers for virtual functions
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]