This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] make it safe to include basic-block.h and tree-flow.h from C++


Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

| > Really funny you should post that.  I had the following patches
| > sitting in my local tree wince wednesday.  For consistency with rtl.h,
| > I prefixed the name of the fields with "va_".  I don't mind which
| > patch is applied, as long as the problem is solved and we have a
| > consistent way of doing things.
| 
| I want to say that va_ is not the correct thing used here as va for me
| has me thinking of variable argument and not varrays.

I resisted from calling it "vat_", for obvious reasons (well, if
you're accustomed to EU taxes :-)

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]