This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Making double precision constants work with -fsingle-precision-constant
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:58:31 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Making double precision constants work with -fsingle-precision-constant
- References: <20051129021133.GB14313@lios> <20051129051045.GA19722@redhat.com> <20051207192507.GA8702@lios> <20051207203422.GB10702@redhat.com> <20051208164853.GH8702@lios>
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:48:54AM -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Would it be useful to define __DBL_HAS_DENORM__, it is already a
> property of the format (gcc/gcc/real.h)?
I didn't think it was useful before, but now it would appear
to be required. Supposing we keep this option.
> It makes poorly written code run faster. If that isn't a compelling
> argument for keeping the flag then I don't know what is... :)
Bah. Not being the one being paid for this, I have very
little sympathy.
r~