This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -fasm=intel not always suppported

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org (gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:16:50 -0800
Subject: Re: -fasm=intel not always suppported
References: <200511151957.jAFJvslp010313@earth.phy.uc.edu>

On Nov 15, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

It has been rejected at least twice before and already has
been said it will never be accepted.

I have secured approval in concept of two GWP people, if the code manages to meet their requirements. I don't see any reason that that cannot be done.

One more thing.  MS style inline-asm does not work for new
instructions which is where the only place where inline-asm
should be used.

? If you have examples of things that don't work, I'd be happy to fix them all. Feel free to shoot them to me in email. The intent is for almost everything to work.

You can check testsuite/gcc.apple/asm-block-13.[Cc] for examples that do work, should cover most instructions with quite a few of the addressing modes as well.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -fasm=intel not always suppported
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: -fasm=intel not always suppported
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]