This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [committed] Fix fixincludes/check.tpl for CVS->subversion

From: Bruce Korb <bkorb at gnu dot org>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:18:34 -0800
Subject: Re: [committed] Fix fixincludes/check.tpl for CVS->subversion
References: <m3br0zffq0.fsf@gromit.moeb> <dkktmj$jn7$1@sea.gmane.org> <m3r79n60wz.fsf@gromit.moeb>

Hi Guys,

On Friday 11 November 2005 12:31 am, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> Bruce, what do you think?  Should we support both CVS and Subversion
> as proposed?

Absolutely.  :)

> The patch is ok but I'm not sure whether this is needed, 

The best, I think, would be to use:

  find * -type d \( -name CVS -o -name .svn \) -prune -o -type f -print

and skip the grepping altogether.  And, of course, port back to all
active branches.

Cheers -Bruce

References:
- [committed] Fix fixincludes/check.tpl for CVS->subversion
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [committed] Fix fixincludes/check.tpl for CVS->subversion
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: [committed] Fix fixincludes/check.tpl for CVS->subversion
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]