This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR traget/24188 (-mcmodel=medium ICE)

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>,gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:14:56 +0100
Subject: Re: PR traget/24188 (-mcmodel=medium ICE)
References: <20051104121104.GB23668@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20051104204638.GA12817@redhat.com> <20051104205926.GK16034@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20051104220643.GA13049@redhat.com>

> On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 03:59:27PM -0500, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > But I'm pretty certain none of those intrinsic routines would mind
> > if NULL has been passed instead.
> 
> I really don't like zero sized objects at all.  If we can get
> away with not creating them in the first place, I think that
> would be best.

I can drop the size 0 test part of patch (still we should not ICE on
large strings) and change this to fortran frontend bug...

Honza
> 
> 
> r~

References:
- PR traget/24188 (-mcmodel=medium ICE)
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: PR traget/24188 (-mcmodel=medium ICE)
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PR traget/24188 (-mcmodel=medium ICE)
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: PR traget/24188 (-mcmodel=medium ICE)
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]