Re: [gomp] Fix sharing-1.c and sharing-1.C

[Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>]

On Tuesday 18 October 2005 16:10, Richard Henderson wrote:

> FWIW, icc 9.0 passes this test case.  One can guess, then, that
> we can't use copy-in/out if the variable is TREE_ADDRESSABLE.
>
That's what I'm playing with now, yes.  The obvious change will prevent us 
from doing constant propagation inside the children, though.

It's tempting to just schedule omp lowering later, but that would be 
unpleasant for other reasons.  The thing is that we do lose by lowering 
too early.  We are converting intra procedural problems into 
inter-procedural ones.  Sigh.