This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Documentation for @file for inclusion in other manuals
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 22:49:39 -0700
- Subject: Re: Documentation for @file for inclusion in other manuals
- References: <434190FB.8060805@codesourcery.com>
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I just checked in some documentation for @file to binutils. But, then,
> I realized that we'll want it in all programs that use expandargv.
>
> So, it seems better to put this in libiberty/response.texi, where it
> could be @include'd by those manuals that want to use it? Is it OK to
> check this in? Or, do you want to see a formal patch first? Or, is
> there some better way to share the user documentation?
After some off-list discussion (due to me bungling email addresses),
this patch has been checked in as libiberty/at-file.texi to both the gcc
and src repositories.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304