This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 11:33:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
References: <433460A2.4010704@gmail.com> <200509261451.j8QEppq42394@makai.watson.ibm.com> <19c433eb050926080540b09539@mail.gmail.com> <200509261508.j8QF86q36346@makai.watson.ibm.com> <fxcoudert@gmail.com> <19c433eb05092608183beb48d9@mail.gmail.com> <200509261521.j8QFLXq34138@makai.watson.ibm.com> <19c433eb050926082727f39b8f@mail.gmail.com>

On Sep 26, 2005, at 11:27 AM, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:

Btw, I'm surprised to see that on AIX, __clog is a special case: all
other complex functions are defined "correctly".

I am not since std::clog is also a symbol in C++98. In fact the clog builtin was just enabled for 4.1.0 because of a bug in the C++ front-end's namelookup for builtin functions.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
  - From: FX Coudert
- Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: [libgfortran,patch] C99 complex cleanup
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]