This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Bug middle-end/23991] [4.1 Regression]: Gcc failed to build on ia64
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Joern RENNECKE <joern dot rennecke at st dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Sep 2005 12:29:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: [Bug middle-end/23991] [4.1 Regression]: Gcc failed to build on ia64
- References: <20050921100151.23991.hjl@lucon.org><20050921112847.1315.qmail@sourceware.org> <43316897.3090801@st.com><m3ll1qteg4.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><8c19a6d37e8b4494f77fbac32381301e@physics.uc.edu>
Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:
> On Sep 21, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> > Joern RENNECKE <joern.rennecke@st.com> writes:
> >
> >> 2005-09-21 J"orn Rennecke <joern.rennecke@st.com>
> >>
> >> * final.c (get_attr_length_1): In !HAVE_ATTR_length case, define as
> >> macro. Don't attach ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED to arguments.
> >> (get_attr_length, get_attr_min_length): Add ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
> >
> > Ick, don't do that. Suppose you just #define insn_default_length and
> > insn_min_length as macros ifndef HAVE_ATTR_length.
>
>
> Of course both insn_default_length and insn_min_length are used as
> functions
> in this situation.
Hmmm, right. Bother. Still doable, but uglier.
Ian