This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [gomp] Support statically scheduled parallel loops

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:49:55 -0700
Subject: Re: [gomp] Support statically scheduled parallel loops
References: <20050920213311.GA22694@topo.toronto.redhat.com> <b4afa726e93878b04f5bf43cc5287663@physics.uc.edu> <43308EC5.4010604@redhat.com> <c82e57726d29020de5c8f1e08457dc78@physics.uc.edu>

On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 07:35:31PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I don't know how other compilers handle these case ...

They don't.  The form of the omp for is *very* restricted.

We'll get around to rejecting all the things that are illegal,
but it hasn't been done yet.


r~

References:
- [gomp] Support statically scheduled parallel loops
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [gomp] Support statically scheduled parallel loops
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [gomp] Support statically scheduled parallel loops
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [gomp] Support statically scheduled parallel loops
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]