This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Add support for arm-none-linux-gnueabi (Take 2)

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at apple dot com>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kazu Hirata <kazu at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 16:11:02 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] Add support for arm-none-linux-gnueabi (Take 2)
References: <200509152125.j8FLPuYN017729@sparrowhawk.codesourcery.com> <200509152312.35947.paul@codesourcery.com> <20172023-F700-4C62-8871-7CC76C45CB51@apple.com> <200509160008.55275.paul@codesourcery.com>


No, but there are big-endian variants.  It's also fairly common to use
architecture versions (eg. armv5-whatever).

:)

If so, should probably change the rest of the arm bits in configure.in.

Probably. gcc, binutils and newlib are somewhat inconsistent about what they accept. arm*- is also consistent with the other occurrence in this patch.

'k.

-eric

References:
- [patch] Add support for arm-none-linux-gnueabi (Take 2)
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] Add support for arm-none-linux-gnueabi (Take 2)
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] Add support for arm-none-linux-gnueabi (Take 2)
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: [patch] Add support for arm-none-linux-gnueabi (Take 2)
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]