This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at linux-mips dot org>, Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 10:56:05 -0700
Subject: Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c
References: <20050829142016.GA2687@bubble.grove.modra.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0508291602000.12296@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <5100bee0ddfccf7f926a25b68804c8aa@physics.uc.edu>

> It does not have a frame because we sibling call optimize check_fa_work
> which enables us not to have a frame pointer (or a stack pointer change)
> in check_fa_mid.

Then we should find some way to prevent that.  Like returning different
values from the functions.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: gcc.c-torture/execute/frame-address.c
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]