This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gfortran,ping] support for large kinds in front-end and library
- From: François-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
- To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- Cc: patch <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 22:45:13 +0200
- Subject: Re: [gfortran,ping] support for large kinds in front-end and library
- References: <42F1415C.2050603@gmail.com> <20050820185136.GA80390@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
> Well, I've clearly done something wrong. Every test in the
> testsuite is failing with your patch. If I look in gfortran.log
> I see
>
> Executing on host: /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/gcc/testsuite/../gfortran -B/home/kargl/gcc/obj4
> 1/gcc/testsuite/../ /home/kargl/gcc/gcc41/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/PR19754_2.f90 -O0
> -pedantic-errors -L/home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs -L
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libiberty -lm -o ./PR19754_2.exe (t
> imeout = 300)
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `_gfortrani_internal_pack_c8'
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `_gfortrani_internal_unpack_4'
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `csin'
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `csqrt'
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `_gfortrani_internal_unpack_c4'
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `_gfortrani_internal_pack_8'
> /home/kargl/gcc/obj41/i386-unknown-freebsd7.0/./libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `ccosf'
Have you regenerated the generated files (maybe you need to remove all
generated files before regenerating them)?
As for your other comments, I do agree with you. I wonder if there was
a third comment, since I only have comments #1, #2 and #4 (but the
mail with comment #2 maybe contained two comments).
FX