This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re:towards fixing PR20794/PR19893 (vectorizer tests cleanup)
- From: Dorit Naishlos <DORIT at il dot ibm dot com>
- To: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, sje at cup dot hp dot com
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:03:11 +0300
- Subject: Re:towards fixing PR20794/PR19893 (vectorizer tests cleanup)
Thanks, committed.
Unfortunately this patch (from April) is no longer enough to avoid the
alignment warning that Steve's patch would produce -
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02284.html. I don't know why
(what has changed since then to cause this), but now we also need to
address the places
where we use "aligned pointers" - pointers to types whose alignment is
bigger than their size. I described what would be needed for that in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02874.html. I'll submit the
rest in a seperate patch.
dorit
Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com> wrote on 16/08/2005 03:48:28:
> > Changelog:
> > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-35: Use aligned arrays instead of arrays to
> > aligned type
> > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-40: Likewise.
>
> Hi Dorit,
>
> This patch is OK.
>
> :REVIEWMAIL:
>