This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [gomp] More IL work
- From: Sebastian Pop <sebastian dot pop at cri dot ensmp dot fr>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:02:46 +0200
- Subject: Re: [gomp] More IL work
- References: <20050713230235.GA27453@topo.toronto.redhat.com> <20050719095140.GA7735@napoca.cri.ensmp.fr> <20050719134525.GA14690@topo.toronto.redhat.com> <20050719160653.GC6714@napoca.cri.ensmp.fr> <20050719182316.GC16454@topo.toronto.redhat.com> <20050801173918.GA985@napoca.cri.ensmp.fr> <20050802152204.GA2872@topo.toronto.redhat.com>
Diego Novillo wrote:
> When you say "flag some of the loops", do you mean flag the loop
> structures? If so, I think that would be workable.
>
Yes, that's what I mean.
> The only time we need the loops lexically marked is when
> processing OpenMP pragmas in the FE. But once we are in the
> optimizers, transformations should just work with the loop
> structures and feed the loop bodies into the thread creation
> code.
Agreed. So I will continue to work in this direction.
Thanks Diego.