This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch ping] libffi: SH: Unreviewed patches
- From: Joern RENNECKE <joern dot rennecke at st dot com>
- To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>, aoliva at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:24:48 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch ping] libffi: SH: Unreviewed patches
- References: <20050720.234904.26541395.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>
Kaz Kojima wrote:
Ping? Now it's needed to fix the failure for cls_1_1byte.c on
sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg00672.html
BTW, I'm happy if someone reviews the following patch which
is 10 months old now :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-09/msg01063.html
I don't see anything wrong with these patches, but on the other
hand, I can't really confirm that they do the right thing.
Considering that you wrote most of the sh libffi, and also appear
to do most of the testing with libffi, I suppose you are the de-facto
maintainer of the SH libffi port. So on that basis, I say these
patches are OK to check in.
Moreover, I think we should ask the GCC steering comittee to
officially extend your maintainership to SH libffi.
Alexandre, do you agree?