This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gfortran testsuite, committed] Re: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> 
> 
>>Mark, since you probably don't know precisely what we're talking about: a few
>>days ago I introduced testsuite/gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 together with a
>>bugfix. 
> 
> 
> It is OK to fix this before 4.0.1, but please be careful not to do 
> anything too destabilizing; it would be bad to introduce major gfortran 
> bugs in the hope of eliminating a spurious testsuite failure, for example.

I've committed Jakub's first patch, which can be found here
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-06/msg00138.html>.  This should leave the
FORALL statement slightly less broken than before, and therefore shouldn't be
destabilizing.  On the mainline I also un-XFAILed gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90 again.

- Tobi
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]