This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Make SMS use doloop_condition_get

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
Cc: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Mostafa Hagog <MUSTAFA at il dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:31:03 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make SMS use doloop_condition_get
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0506010954190.29312-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <200506022238.18124.stevenb@suse.de> <20050602211431.GA11703@redhat.com> <200506022323.05804.stevenb@suse.de>

On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 11:23:05PM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> That is correct, and it has been like that from the beginning.  SMS only
> handles doloops right now.  I considered wrapping the entire pass in #if
> HAVE_doloop_end, but I guess someone somewhen will want to make it work
> on other loops as well.  If you prefer wrapping the entire file, just let
> me know and I'll post a new patch.

What I'd prefer is handling other kinds of loops.  What's interesting
about doloop in the first place?  It's just a specialized form of a
count-down loop...


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Make SMS use doloop_condition_get
  - From: Mostafa Hagog

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Make SMS use doloop_condition_get
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [PATCH] Make SMS use doloop_condition_get
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [PATCH] Make SMS use doloop_condition_get
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH] Make SMS use doloop_condition_get
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]