This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Problems with PR 21210
Mark Mitchell <email@example.com> writes:
| (I'm surprised by Gaby's proposal in that I'm very surprised that the
| library people would consider silently changing the behavior of
| constructing a "std::complex<double>" from a "__complex__ double" to
| be anything other than the obvious copy. But, if the library people
| are happy, it's OK with me.)
I think that is unfair characterization :-)
The proposal was that constructuing a "std::complex<double>" from a
"__complex__" should be written make_cxx_complex(z).
| My original suggestion to add constructors to std::complex requires no
| changes to the language and is backwards-compatible with ISO C++, as
| far as I can tell; what's wrong with that?
It shifted the complexity to somewhere else without actually seeming
to solve it. That is why I'm uncomfortable with it -- but it is not a
"no way" answer. And it does not seem to be some unique to libstdc++
(at least in the scope of the proposed increaed compatibility with C99).