This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ping: Patch for 21562

On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 18:08 -0600, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:08 -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01888.html
> It really seems to me that the problem is verify_flow and expand
> really need to be fixed.  Any code that assumes block 0 is a
> successor of ENTRY is broken.
> 

In fact, i'm about to post a patch in seconds which changes ENTRY and
EXIT to be 0 and 1, so assuming 0 is a successor of ENTRY would be dumb
in this world :)

> Is there some fundamental reason why we can't fix verify_flow and
> expand?
> 
> Jeff
>
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]