This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Ping: Patch for 21562
On May 26, 2005, at 5:08 PM, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:08 -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
It really seems to me that the problem is verify_flow and expand
really need to be fixed. Any code that assumes block 0 is a
successor of ENTRY is broken.
Is there some fundamental reason why we can't fix verify_flow and
Not that I know of. Is there consensus that this is the right thing to