This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, 4.0] back port: Make TREE_OVERFLOWed constant gimple_min_invariant

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:00:08 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 4.0] back port: Make TREE_OVERFLOWed constant gimple_min_invariant
References: <57c91e5448698c742a9a42cdd75b6b96@physics.uc.edu> <20050517160413.GB29687@topo.toronto.redhat.com>

On May 17, 2005, at 12:04 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 08:27:05PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote:

	Backport from the mainline:
	2005-03-14  Zdenek Dvorak  <dvorakz@suse.cz>

	* tree-cfg.c (find_taken_edge_cond_expr): Use zero_p instead of
	integer_zerop.
	* tree-gimple.c (is_gimple_min_invariant): Consider overflowed
	constants invariant.

OK, except the fortran/trans-intrinsic.c hunk.  You need to
indicate which PRs and add tests to the testsuite.

What's this?


It was also part of Zdenek's original patch too.
Ok, I will remove it then.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, 4.0] back port: Make TREE_OVERFLOWed constant gimple_min_invariant
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [PATCH, 4.0] back port: Make TREE_OVERFLOWed constant gimple_min_invariant
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH, 4.0] back port: Make TREE_OVERFLOWed constant gimple_min_invariant
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]