This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Remove TARGET_SWITCHES from the SH port

From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
To: Joern RENNECKE <joern dot rennecke at st dot com>
Cc: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:47:55 +0100
Subject: Re: RFA: Remove TARGET_SWITCHES from the SH port
References: <87psvschtr.fsf@firetop.home> <87ll6gcfxt.fsf@firetop.home><orvf5kytyu.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><4288D350.2010105@st.com>

Joern RENNECKE <joern.rennecke@st.com> writes:
> These headers are supposed to be included by the sh-superh-elf /
> sh64-superh-elf configurations.  However, we can't do this right now,
> because some more merge issues need to be resolved, and we also need to
> fix some problems in gas, ld and libgloss.

OK, thanks for the explanation.  In that case, would it be OK to commit
the patch without the removal of superh.h and superh64.h?  The patch
won't really break anything related to them, in the sense that defining
TARGET_PROCESSOR_SWITCHES wouldn't have any effect in the current
sources anyway, even if the header files _were_ used.  The macros
will then just document for what a future .opt file would need to contain.

Richard

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: Remove TARGET_SWITCHES from the SH port
  - From: Joern RENNECKE

References:
- RFA: Enabling options with preprocessor conditions
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- RFA: Remove TARGET_SWITCHES from the SH port
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFA: Remove TARGET_SWITCHES from the SH port
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: RFA: Remove TARGET_SWITCHES from the SH port
  - From: Joern RENNECKE

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]