This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH]: Fix PR tree-optimization/21407
Mark Mitchell wrote:
I don't think it's safe to read standards that way. It's often muddled
in standards what's meant as example and what's meant as normative text.
It's not supposed to be muddled, but it often is.
Hmmm, that's not the way the Fortran Standard works. We have "normative
text" and "Notes", which are "informative".
This all lead some on the WG5/J3 committee meeting last week comment on
moving a sentence from a note to the "normative text" as to
"dis-informative" them (you really, really have to love English for this).
Toon Moene - e-mail: email@example.com - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/
News on GNU Fortran 95: http://gfortran.org/