This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] - Addressing minor hot/cold partitioning concerns
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Caroline Tice <ctice at apple dot com>
- Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, dave dot anglin at nrc dot ca, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 12:52:05 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] - Addressing minor hot/cold partitioning concerns
- References: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Caroline Tice <email@example.com> writes:
> This patch addresses the minor concerns Zack asked me to address with
> respect to the last hot/cold partitioning patch. It also fixes a few
> small problems I discovered when I turned on -ffunction-sections.
> This patch has been tested on an Apple G4 running powerpc-darwin, and
> on an i686 running Linux. It has passes a profiledboostrap with
> partitioning; a profiledbootstrap without partitioning but with basic
> block reordering; a regular bootstrap; and the DejaGnu tests. It also
> has passed several SPEC 2000 benchmarks with various combinations of
> function sections and partitioning turned on and off.
> I would especially appreciate people with access to AIX or HPUX
> machines looking over (testing?) this patch, as I do not have access
> to those architectures.
> Is this okay to commit to FSF mainline?
I do not see any problems with this patch, and will approve it, but
ask that you wait one week for AIX and/or HPUX testing.