This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Prototypes [was Re: Patch for bugs 772 and 17913]
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
- To: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>
- Cc: Gábor Lóki <loki at inf dot u-szeged dot hu>,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 00:28:45 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: Prototypes [was Re: Patch for bugs 772 and 17913]
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0505030914440.14849-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Roger Sayle wrote:
> [http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html]
> Admittedly, this document is some what out of date, as it doesn't
> describe GCC's decision to move to C89/C90 and the default authority
> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html still recommends
> using K&R style function declarations and PARAMS-like macros in
> function prototypes, which have recently been abandoned by the GCC
> project: http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Standard-C
Any chance you could cook up a patch for codingconventions.html describing
these differences versus the GNU Coding Conventions?
Gerald