This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [wwwdocs] Move some "is a separate page for"-project links into the TOC


On Tuesday 03 May 2005 14:49, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > In projects/index.html there are now 8 projects for which the TOC entry
> > only links to a comment about a separate page for that project, e.g.
>
> I have to admit I was wondering about your plans for these. :-)

:-)

> > This patch simply moves the links to those other pages into the TOC.
>
> Okay, looks fine.

Thanks, commited.

> > After this patch, there are still four projects with full (but short)
> > descriptions of what the project is about.  I'm not sure what to do
> > about them.  Ideas?
>
> Implement them and remove them from the list?

I have inquired about the status of these projects, but some (like the
"simpler_porting" thing) are just not being worded on at all, and even
Zack didn't know the status on the "improve_the_installation_procedure",
so they'll just be sitting there for a while ;-)

> Seriously, I think we 
> can just keep them there -- just remove the "Other languages" section,
> which doesn't really provide any benefit.

Alright, like so?

I also removed the remark about the scheduler because it predates the
DFA model.  The problem with the scheduler is not with the machine
model now but with the scheduler itself, and we have PRs for that.

Gr.
Steven

Index: index.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -3 -p -r1.60 index.html
--- index.html	3 May 2005 22:58:13 -0000	1.60
+++ index.html	4 May 2005 08:32:44 -0000
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@ help develop GCC:</p>
 <li><a href="c-frontend.html">Projects for improving the C front end.</a></li>
 <li><a href="#improve_the_installation_procedure">Improve the installation procedure</a></li>
 <li><a href="#simpler_porting">Simpler porting</a></li>
-<li><a href="#other_languages">Other languages</a></li>
 <li><a href="#generalize_the_machine_model">Generalize the machine model</a></li>
 <li><a href="#the_old_problems_file">The old PROBLEMS file</a></li>
 </ul>
@@ -36,6 +35,8 @@ help develop GCC:</p>
 <p>Remember to <a href="../contributewhy.html">keep other developers
 informed</a> of any substantial projects you intend to work on.</p>
 
+<hr />
+
 <h2><a name="improve_the_installation_procedure">Improve the installation procedure</a></h2>
 
 <ul>
@@ -92,15 +93,6 @@ kind of addressing, and this pattern wou
       in the RTL expression.</li>
 </ul>
 
-<h2><a name="other_languages">Other languages</a></h2>
-
-<p>We currently have front ends for Ada, C, C++, Objective C, 
-Fortran, and Java.  A Pascal front end exists but has not yet
-been integrated.</p>
-
-<p>Cobol and Modula-2 front ends might be useful, and are being worked
-on.</p>
-
 <h2><a name="generalize_the_machine_model">Generalize the machine model</a></h2>
 
 <p>Some new compiler features may be needed to do a good job on
@@ -110,9 +102,6 @@ machines where static data needs to be a
 used for scalars and another for large objects.  The compiler does not
 now have a way to understand this.</p>
 
-<p>The scheduler does not do very well on recent RISC machines.  Haifa
-helps but not enough.</p>
-
 <h2><a name="the_old_problems_file">The old PROBLEMS file</a></h2>
 
 <p>The following used to be in a file <code>PROBLEMS</code> in the GCC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]