This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] tree-outof-ssa.c: VECify stmt_list.
> Presumably you are planning to do the same conversion to the edge_leader
> 3) means that perform_edge_inserts has to know something about the
> internals of analyze_edge_for_bb, which I don't like from a design
> esthetic. Its certainly better than 2), and isn't really a big deal
> simply because we are talking about a single routine as opposed to a
> real interface of some sort.
> I have no strong feelings about 1) or 3), so you can go with 3) if you
OK. I'll go with 3). I might introduce something like
init_analyze_edge_bb and fini_analyze_edge_bb to alleviate your
esthetic concern, which I do share.