This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Fix tree-optimization/20139.
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
- To: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, hp at axis dot com
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:57:19 -0600
- Subject: Re: [patch] Fix tree-optimization/20139.
- Organization: Red Hat, Inc
- References: <1109178053.2635.86.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050223.124313.90828966.kazu@cs.umass.edu> <1109613952.662.48.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050402.105611.59485937.kazu@cs.umass.edu>
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
On Sat, 2005-04-02 at 10:56 -0500, Kazu Hirata wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Is there any way you could approve
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01381.html
>
> as is for 4.0 and mainline since this PR is about a regression?
I'm willing to OK it for the branch if it's OK with Mark.
For the mainline, I'd rather us evaluate folding anything that TER
creates and then decide if we want your patch or folding TER.
ie, for mainline let's do the right thing the first time rather than
install a temporary patch that we may (or may not) want to pull out
in favor of a more general solution.
Jeff