This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch,libgfortran & patch,fortran] Namelist


Mostly "if( adfn" and the like, but I don't remember why I cut my offer to

A few of which are deliberate attempts to line up conditions of the same order that are continued on subsequent lines. A few are indeed errors. A good number were there in the first place.


deal with this after you committed the patch from my e-mail. It's not like
libgfortran is the pinnacle of good formatting anyway, so I don't think I have
too much right to complain. And as I said, to me, it's not a reason to hold

In some very literal sense, I have taken the gcc style guide to heart and continued in the same way as the rest of the program! I notice small style problems in a number of the other patches that are coming in.


back a patch which adds a much-requested functionality.


I have done a number of further style corrections and the testsuite is running on the commit version, right now. It looks as if I will be able to commit tonight.


Sometime next week, I will run a style checker on libgfortran and will put right the worst excesses or, depending on the amount, the lot. If the result bootstraps and regtests is it OK to commit on the obviously correct rule?

Paul T



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]