This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph


On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:52:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:49:05AM +0200, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
> > newlib/libgloss and other low level candidates like u-boot extensive
> > boot loader all appear to be clean. The linux kernel is just confused.
> > The Glibc turns out to be just plain sick. As always if you dare
> > to take a closer look at it...
> 
> I'm quite familiar with it, thanks.  You might want to take a better
> look at it, though, if you think that it can be replaced by
> __attribute__((section(".init"))).  It's splitting up functions, in the
> same way that GCC's crtstuff.c does, and for the same reasons.

To be more precise: that's what the initfini bits are about; my "not
sure why" comment was for errlist/siglist.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]