This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Add -fobey-inline (was: Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns)
- From: Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:11:22 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add -fobey-inline (was: Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns)
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502281158110.2297-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
On Feb 28, 2005, at 5:28 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Mark Mitchell wrote:
5. However, it really might be sensible to have the C++ front end
treat
"inline" as a command, rather than a hint, by default. It might be
that
explicit uses of inline should be pretty much unconditionally honored.
I found a patch to add -fobey-inline that does exactly this lying
around
here and updated it. Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Apple tried this to build our OS and the results were not good: huge
bloat.
(If you go back a month from the message Richard pointed at and continue
the thread from the message from Stuart he's replying to, you'll see
references to this.)