This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Fix tree-optimization/20139.

From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
To: Jeffrey A Law <law at redhat dot com>
Cc: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:10:03 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix tree-optimization/20139.
References: <20050222.205231.118631279.kazu@cs.umass.edu><1109178053.2635.86.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> > 2005-02-22  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
> >
> > 	PR tree-optimization/20139
> > 	* tree-cfg.c (fold_cond_expr_cond): Export.
> > 	* tree-flow.h: Add a prototype for fold_cond_expr_cond.
> > 	* tree-optimize.c (execute_cleanup_cfg_post_optimizing): Call
> > 	fold_cond_expr_cond.
> >
> > 2005-02-22  Kazu Hirata  <kazu@cs.umass.edu>
> >
> > 	PR tree-optimization/20139
> > 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr20139.c: New.
> FWIW, we might consider just folding any expression that is subject
> to TER.  I've got a patch somewhere around here which does that.

Would it be sufficient to go with Kazu's fix?  "A patch
somewhere here" sounds like 4.1 material, and the 4.0 branch is
imminent.

brgds, H-P

References:
- [patch] Fix tree-optimization/20139.
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: [patch] Fix tree-optimization/20139.
  - From: Jeffrey A Law

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]