This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678
- From: FranÃois-Xavier Coudert <Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at lcp dot u-psud dot fr>
- To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:08:35 +0100
- Subject: Re: Patch proposal for PR 19678
- Organization: Laboratoire de Chimie Physique
- References: <421DD9EF.70904@lcp.u-psud.fr> <200502241451.16563.paul@codesourcery.com>
Would it also be worth fixing mac line-endings (just '\r') at the same time?
I was scared someone would eventually say this. The thing is: I don't know
which platforms still use '\r'. I guess MacOSX now uses Unix-style
line-endings, doesn't it?
It's gonna be much more difficult to treat '\r' than to add '\r\n' support,
since everytime we see a '\r', we wouldn't know if it is the end of a line
or if we need waiting for the following '\n'. Since nobody has asked for
that yet (and we're not yet using gfortran on old MacOS), I would be for
keeping it simple right now.
FX