This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH - ping] Don't unlink /dev/null on darwin

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Peter O'Gorman" <peter at pogma dot com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:38:19 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH - ping] Don't unlink /dev/null on darwin
References: <4210B1A0.80907@pogma.com> <87psz3qayf.fsf@codesourcery.com><42113149.2090100@pogma.com> <87k6papvjc.fsf@codesourcery.com><994cb8640bbdc86f615e1e8fb3c006f4@dalecki.de>

Marcin Dalecki <martin@dalecki.de> writes:
>>
>> are more such issues.  Further, I suspect that using a temporary file
>> here will cause parallel make headaches.
>
> Don't think so, since the commands will remain in the same rule.

Consider parallel recursive invocations of libgcc.mk.  May or may not
be possible, but I'm not bloody risking it, OK?  The makefiles are
already enough trouble.

zw

References:
- [PATCH - ping] Don't unlink /dev/null on darwin
  - From: Peter O'Gorman
- Re: [PATCH - ping] Don't unlink /dev/null on darwin
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH - ping] Don't unlink /dev/null on darwin
  - From: Peter O'Gorman
- Re: [PATCH - ping] Don't unlink /dev/null on darwin
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH - ping] Don't unlink /dev/null on darwin
  - From: Marcin Dalecki

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]