This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Possible patch for tree-optimization/13000

On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:08:51PM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> (At minimum, the 
> behaviour of SWITCH_EXPR isn't the same until gimplification is 
> complete.  Perhaps it's a mistake to give the two behaviours the
> same name...)

Not quite true.  We could check SWITCH_LABELS vs SWITCH_BODY in 
block_may_fallthru.  Only one of the two should be non-null, and
which is set determines its behaviour.


r~
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]