This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] add split condition to *fix_trunchi_1

From: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
To: Uros Bizjak <uros at kss-loka dot si>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:43:40 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add split condition to *fix_trunchi_1
References: <4191C131.1000307@kss-loka.si> <87bre640t2.fsf@codesourcery.com><4191C4A0.8040003@kss-loka.si>

Uros Bizjak <uros@kss-loka.si> writes:

> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
>>>-  ""
>>>+  "&& 1"
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Aren't these functionally identical?  If not, why not?
>>
>>
> This text is from gccint.info, "Insn Splitting" chapter:

The text you quote does not answer my question.

zw

References:
- [PATCH] add split condition to *fix_trunchi_1
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: [PATCH] add split condition to *fix_trunchi_1
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: [PATCH] add split condition to *fix_trunchi_1
  - From: Uros Bizjak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]