Re: gcc/gcc/testsuite ChangeLog gcc.dg/c90-const-e ...

[Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>]

On 24/10/2004, at 3:49 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 geoffk@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
>
> > Log message:
> > 	* gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-3.c: xfail all the ASSERT_NOT_NPC tests.
> > 	* gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-3.c: Likewise.
> >
> > Patches:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ 
> > ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4488&r2=1.4489
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90- 
> > const-expr-3.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99- 
> > const-expr-3.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
>
> This patch doesn't yet seem to have appeared on gcc-patches.  In any  
> case,
> regressions should only be marked XFAIL when there is a corresponding  
> PR
> marked as a regression, i.e. you need to mark bug 5675 as a regression  
> or
> open a new regression bug and make bug 5675 depend on it.

I tried to do the right things to update bug 5675; I hope I got it  
right.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature