This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: getting rid of ggc_push_context

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:16:40 -0700
Subject: Re: getting rid of ggc_push_context
References: <20041001114718.GI10273@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <87pt42v5x8.fsf@codesourcery.com> <20041001150715.GR13056@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <87lleqv4ot.fsf@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 08:28:02AM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I seriously wonder whether the ggc_collect call inside CSE is still
> necessary.

Until we get rid of cse-follow-jumps, I don't see that much has
changed in how CSE operates.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: getting rid of ggc_push_context
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: getting rid of ggc_push_context
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- Cleanup tree_rest_of_compilation interface
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Cleanup tree_rest_of_compilation interface
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- getting rid of ggc_push_context (was Re: Cleanup tree_rest_of_compilation interface)
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: getting rid of ggc_push_context
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]