This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: MIPS o32 ABI fix and o64 ABI change

From: Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at redhat dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
Cc: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Thiemo Seufer <ica2_ts at csv dot ica dot uni-stuttgart dot de>, wilson at specifixinc dot com
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:42:11 +0100
Subject: Re: RFC: MIPS o32 ABI fix and o64 ABI change
References: <87oejyvldp.fsf@redhat.com><1095885465.2690.71.camel@localhost.localdomain><m3brfyow8f.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> writes:
> Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com> writes:
>> I'd appreciate it if Jim piped up here. From what I recall he was the
>> initiator of o64 and he may remember what the aim was at the time.
>
> I'm not sure whether Jim or I created O64, but I am sure that the idea
> was to not skip floating point registers.  If O64 skips $f13 when the
> second argument has type float, I'm sure that is a bug.

Thanks Ian, I was hoping that was the case.  Patch now applied.

Richard

References:
- RFC: MIPS o32 ABI fix and o64 ABI change
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: RFC: MIPS o32 ABI fix and o64 ABI change
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: RFC: MIPS o32 ABI fix and o64 ABI change
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]