This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Don't handle #pragma in cp_lexer_peek_token

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:22:16 -0400
Subject: Re: Don't handle #pragma in cp_lexer_peek_token
References: <87isa71haz.fsf@codesourcery.com> <200409221507.i8MF7lV27696@makai.watson.ibm.com> <87zn3iz2c2.fsf@codesourcery.com>

On Sep 22, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:

David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:

Bootstrapped amd64-linux with no regressions.
This should have been bootstrapped on a non-Linux system.
It was: powerpc-darwin.
This system doesn't define NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C, but it ought to (the
system headers contain explicit extern "C" markers).  I don't have
access to any target which needs implicit extern "C".


No Darwin still needs NOT to define NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C for the mach
headers but as I said it might change for 8.0 (but since I cannot
test it there, I cannot test a patch for it).

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- Don't handle #pragma in cp_lexer_peek_token
  - From: Zack Weinberg
- Re: Don't handle #pragma in cp_lexer_peek_token
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Don't handle #pragma in cp_lexer_peek_token
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]