Re: [PATCH] Add VEC_COND_EXPR node

[Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 08:17:21PM -0600, Roger Sayle wrote:
> My apologies if these issues were considered and resolved when this
> topic was discussed on the gcc list, but unfortunately keeping up
> with gcc-patches is hard enough.  Has anyone considered VEC_LT_EXPR,
> VEC_GE_EXPR, VEC_EQ_EXPR, etc...?

No, we hadn't discussed that.  I had sort of been hoping to
avoid it too...  Would a <vector boolean n> result type for
the EQ_EXPR make you happy?


r~